M
Vasari Codex · Artist Status Report

M. E.

Artist profile

Profile
42
34–51 band

Discovery profile: representation network

Descriptive Codex signal report built from ranking, institutional history, representation, auction records, high-quality press, audience attention, and current activity. Generated May 12, 2026.

Overall42

Composite Codex score

Institutional58

Museums/acquisitions may be sparse

Market8

Thin auction dataset expected

Momentum0

Recent activity and interest

Representation35

Gallery and exhibition traction

Codex Rank#46,830Unclassified
Exhibitions00 current · 0 upcoming
Museum Signal11 acquisitions · 0 exhibitions
Core Median— tracked lots
Sell-throughRecent 3-year market
Social SignalsAudience percentile vs tracked artists

Signal summary

M. E.: representation network. Auction and institutional fields are sparse, so this report emphasizes traction signals rather than market depth.

Observed evidence: 1 current gallery relationship: SCAI The Bathhouse.
Data gaps: Thin auction dataset (0 tracked lots). No high-quality tracked press in the last 12 months.

Representation

Institutional holdings

Museum of Modern Art

Recent Exhibitions

  • No exhibition history recordedConfirm manually before using externally

Market profile

No recent public auction record is currently tracked in Codex. Sell-through: .
No annual auction series yet

Education & awards

  • No education/prize records in CodexCheck CV and gallery documentation

Press Signals

  • No recent high-quality tracked pressReport press signal shows tier-3/4 sources with substantive artist coverage

Publications

  • No publications trackedNo monographs or catalogs recorded in Codex

Peer bands

Peer bands intentionally exclude historical/deceased artists. Each list is a contemporary cohort for one specific question: pricing, career trajectory, or practice context.

Price Band Peers

Comparable contemporary artists clustered around No price band.

Peer set

No defensible cohort from current data.

Career Stage Peers

Contemporary artists at a similar tracked career stage (unclassified).

Peer set

No defensible cohort from current data.

Practice / Medium Peers

Artists with similar medium/practice signals; price and rank are secondary checks.

Peer set
  1. Takashi Murakami#9 · Paintings · $100K–250K · Gagosian #1 · Blue-Chippainting · Pop (fine arts styles) · shared regional context · #9 Codex rank
  2. Hiroshi Sugimoto#17 · Photographs · $25K–50K · Lisson Gallery #7 · Blue-Chipphotography · shared regional context · #17 Codex rank
  3. Anish Kapoor#19 · Sculpture/objects · $250K–500K · Lisson Gallery #7 · Blue-Chipsculpture · shared regional context · #19 Codex rank
  4. Jenny Holzer#52 · Sculpture/objects · $25K–50K · Hauser & Wirth #3 · Blue-Chipsculpture · Conceptual · shared regional context · #52 Codex rank
  5. Alfredo Jaar#165 · Photographs · $10K–25K · Goodman Gallery #25 · Establishedphotography · shared regional context · #165 Codex rank
  6. Tadanori Yokoo#191 · Paintings · $25K–50K · albertz benda #192 · Establishedpainting · shared regional context · #191 Codex rank
  7. Darren Almond#272 · Photographs · $5K–10K · White Cube #6 · Establishedphotography · shared regional context · #272 Codex rank
  8. Mariko Mori#352 · Photographs · Under $5K · Templon #16 · Establishedphotography · Pop (fine arts styles) · shared regional context · #352 Codex rank
  9. Tadao Ando#534 · amanasalto #1,103 · Establishedshared regional context · #534 Codex rank
  10. M. E.
Codex reports are descriptive data summaries, not appraisals, recommendations, or investment advice. Data coverage varies by source; confirm provenance, condition, availability, representation status, and comparable pricing before external presentation or transaction decisions.