The article explores the inherent tensions and conflicts that arise in biennials curated by multiple individuals, arguing that such friction is often seen as a flaw but could instead be embraced as a creative strength. It examines how co-curation can lead to disjointed or contradictory exhibitions, yet suggests that these very qualities reflect the complexity of contemporary art and society.
This matters because biennials are major platforms for shaping art discourse, and the model of co-curation is increasingly common. By reframing discord as a feature rather than a bug, the article challenges conventional expectations of curatorial harmony and opens up new possibilities for more dynamic, multi-voiced exhibitions that better represent diverse perspectives.